Understanding the Role of Prosecutors: A Constitutional Perspective

In the aftermath of the 2024 election season filled with heated debates and passionate discourse, it’s important to take a step back and reflect on some of the narratives that have emerged. One such topic has been the portrayal of prosecutors and their role in handling criminal cases. This post is meant to clarify some misconceptions and provide a better understanding of how the justice system operates, without diving into the politics of specific individuals or campaigns.

The Role of a Prosecutor: Coming in Last

As a former prosecutor, I’ve seen firsthand how the process works. Prosecutors don’t enter a case at the beginning; they’re the last stop in a long chain of events. By the time a case reaches a prosecutor’s desk, much of the groundwork—investigations, arrests, searches, interrogations, and charges—has already been conducted by the police.

However, like any human-driven process, mistakes can happen during these earlier stages. Maybe a search was conducted without proper legal justification. Maybe a suspect wasn’t read their Miranda rights. Perhaps a search warrant was issued without probable cause. These errors aren’t usually intentional, but they have significant legal consequences.

When Mistakes Happen: The Limits of Prosecution

If evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed, meaning it cannot be used in court. This is a cornerstone of constitutional rights in the United States, ensuring that everyone—regardless of the circumstances—receives a fair trial.

When evidence is suppressed, prosecutors may find themselves unable to proceed with a case. This is not about letting someone “off the hook”; it’s about adhering to the Constitution. In some jurisdictions, prosecutors issue what’s called a “nolle prosequi” (commonly referred to as “no pros”), effectively dropping charges because pursuing the case further would violate legal standards.

Protecting Rights Protects Everyone

This process may be frustrating to some, but it’s crucial to understand its broader implications. By protecting the constitutional rights of an accused person, the justice system also safeguards your rights. You can’t champion one part of the Constitution, like the Second Amendment, while disregarding others, such as protections against illegal searches and self-incrimination. It’s a package deal.

The justice system isn’t about perfection; it’s about fairness. And fairness means ensuring that even when mistakes happen, they don’t erode the foundational rights that protect us all.

Dispelling Myths: Prosecutors and Public Safety

No prosecutor takes pleasure in dropping a case. In fact, most are dedicated to justice and public safety. But their job isn’t just to convict; it’s to ensure the law is upheld in every aspect. Missteps in the investigative process don’t mean that police are inherently bad or malicious—mistakes are a natural part of any human endeavor.

The suggestion that prosecutors are casually releasing “bad guys” into society for personal or political reasons is not only misleading but also undermines the trust in a system designed to be impartial and just. It’s important to recognize that these decisions are often made with heavy hearts but firm adherence to the rule of law.

Final Thoughts: The Justice System at Work

Understanding the nuances of the criminal justice process can help dispel misconceptions and foster a more informed public. Our system is designed to balance the rights of individuals with the needs of society, and while it may not always work perfectly, its principles are sound.

Let’s move forward with a deeper appreciation for the complexities of justice and the importance of upholding constitutional rights for everyone. After all, the strength of our democracy lies in its commitment to fairness and the rule of law.